Monday, June 9, 2008

Proposed Amendments to the AUP Corp By-Laws

Dear Friends:
Attached herewith are 3 documents. I am hoping that their dissemination in Cyberlink and FANDiscussion will further increase the awareness of alumni of AUP around the globe to the obsolescence of the AUP By-Laws; furthermore, that the NPUM Corporation and AUP Board of Trustees will see the need and thereby amend them.

Yours as a deeply concerned AUP alumnus,

Onie

[Honesto C. Pascual]

Cc: absroque@yahoo.com, aupprexy@yahoo.com


My Historical Perspective on the AUP Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
[by Honesto C. Pascual]


For almost a decade now, I have been trying to lobby for amendments to the AUP By-Laws [BL]. I started doing so when I was president of AWESNA. I started by talking with erstwhile North Philippine Union Mission [NPUM] president and AUP Board of Trustees [BOT] chairman, Daniel Villoso, and written communication with AUP president Gerry Ellacer. The list I discussed with them included BOT representation from the alumni in North America. Eventually, that came to fruition when a seat in the BOT was granted. And I was able to attend the annual meeting of the BOT in 2000 and 2001. It is unfortunate that at the time of the Dayson/Barayuga fiasco, that seat was rescinded. [This was not the first time alumni from North America were represented in the BOT. During his term as president of WESNAC, Ely Bautista represented us. For reasons we are not clear of, that seat was rescinded sometime before Nonong Tulio took office.]

One of the issues we raised was the election of AUP president. We lobbied for utilizing a search committee [SC] in that process. The suggestion was heeded to. Towards the end of Gerry Ellacer’s term, A SC was formed. Upon AWESNA’s recommendation, Miriam Tumangday was appointed chair of the SC and we were represented in that committee by Ban Alsaybar. They met and interviewed potential candidates and sent a list of three to the BOT. Nilo Barayuga was elected after two successive days of meetings of the BOT. [I was in those meetings.]

During the terms of Nestor Dayson [ND] as NPUM president and Nilo Barayuga [NB] as AUP president, I continued to lobby for amendments. I gave them a list of the provisions in the BL that, in my opinion, needed to be amended. Before anything could be done, the fiasco ensued: NB was removed from office. Robin Saban [RS] was elected by the BOT in his place. [The fiasco has really not been legally resolved. To my knowledge, litigation is still in progress.]

It is of historical interest to note that for decades prior to the fiasco, the BOT did not adhere to the provisions of the BL when PUC and AUP presidents were elected. The BL require election of AUP president from within the BOT membership of fifteen. They further require a presidential term of two years.

Contrary to those provisions, past presidents from Alfonso Roda to Gerry Ellacer were not members of the BOT at the time of their election. I verified this from Lydia Roda, Armando Fabella, Reuben Rafanan, and Gerry Ellacer. [I could not verify about Samuel Ladion.] These presidents were elected to a term of five years which was congruous with General Conference denominational policy.

As a result of the ND/NB fiasco, provisions of the BL were adhered to, rightfully and legally so: the next AUP president, RS, was elected from within the membership of the BOT to a term of two years. ND was not reelected NPUM president when his term ended.

Toward the end of Uly Carbajal’s term as AWESNA president, the Board of Officers empowered me to draft proposed amendments to the BL. When I realized that merely providing a list of provisions to be amended did not suffice, I finally spent time over two weekends to actually write the proposed amendments.

On September 2, 2007, following the AWESNA convention in Palm Springs, I met with AUP president RS. We discussed the proposed amendments. I gave him a copy of the document along with the corresponding rationale for each proposed amendment.

At the AWESNA Board of Officers meeting subsequent to that, I discussed the same proposed amendments with them and their respective rationales. They agreed to continue lobbying for the amendments. So when Abner Roque, the new NPUM president and chairman of the BOT was in Southern California in November 2007, I met with him to discuss the proposed amendments. [AWESNA president Jun Miguel was unable to be in that meeting because he was out of the country on vacation.]

Both RS and AR agreed that the proposed amendments were in order. Both gave their assurances that the documents will be presented to the appropriate committee of the BOT to study them and present their recommendations. To date, those proposed amendments and their corresponding rationales are still in limbo.

However, in an email communication from the BOT chairman dated May 29, 2008, he stated that the documents are “still in the hands of the constitution and Bylaws committee for final endorsement to the Constituency for ratification.” Incidentally, if expansion of BOT membership is ratified, Seventh Article, Section 1 of the Articles of Incorporation must also be amended to reflect that expanded number. This has been communicated to him along with the comment that the members of the Corporation [Ex-officio members of the NPUM Executive Committee plus no more than 10 other officials of the SDA denomination], not the Constituency, are the ones empowered by the BL to amend, repeal, or alter the BL.

The proposed amendments are not an end in themselves. I am certain that upon scrutiny of the BL, other amendments may be in order.


Attached herewith are the proposed amendments and their corresponding rationales. Items to be changed are closed in [parenthesis and underlined]. Proposed amendments are in bold italics.

Proposed Amendments
by Honesto C. Pascual

AMENDED BY-LAWS
OF THE
ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES
OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS, INC.

[FORMERLY PHILIPPINE UNION COLLEGE OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS]


ARTICLE I
BOARD OF TRUSTEES


SECTION 1. 1. Composition At the first meeting of the members of the [c]Corporation, and thereafter every [two] five years, a Board of Trustees, from hereon called the Board, shall be elected. It shall be composed of [fifteen] twenty-one members in good and regular standing in the Seventh-day Adventist denomination, each of whom shall hold [his] their office for a term of [two] five years, or until their successor has been elected and qualified. Of those twenty-one members, the following shall be included: president, executive secretary, treasurer, and educational director of North Philippine Union Mission [or Conference]; president, vice-presidents [or their equivalents] for academic affairs, financial affairs, student affairs, faculty representative, and president of the student government of Adventist University of the Philippines; the presidents of the University’s alumni associations in the Philippines, Western and Eastern North America or their designees; and three non-denominationally employed persons.

SECTION 1.2. Resignation or Removal of Trustees
Trustees may resign from office for any reason or may be removed from office for any of the following causes:
1.2.a.
If a trustee ceases at any time to be a member in good and regular standing in the Seventh-day Adventist denomination, [he] the same shall thereby cease to be a trustee.
1.2.b. Conviction of a crime
1.2.c. Diagnosis of mental or physical incapacity
1.2.d. Three unexcused absences from meetings
1.2.e. Breach of duty of the Constitution and By-laws

SECTION 2. Powers

The Board [of Trustees] shall govern and manage the affairs and business of the [c]Corporation and shall exercise general control over its property. It shall also have power to appoint the officers and employees of the [c]Corporation, to fix their compensation, and to suspend or remove them for cause as the interests of the [c]Corporation may require.
The Board shall also operate the affairs, business and property of the [c]Corporation in harmony with such policy as may be outlined by the members of the [c] Corporation.

SECTION 3. The Board shall have a complete inventory taken annually of the properties and assets of the [c]Corporation.

SECTION 4. The Board shall have its books audited annually, and shall also submit to the Executive Committee annually financial reports of its receipts and disbursements, assets and liabilities, losses and gains, and a complete operating budget for the ensuing year for approval.

SECTION 5. Vacancies
Vacancies in the Board [of Trustees] caused by death, disqualification, resignation, or removal, or otherwise shall be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining members thereof, and the member so elected shall hold office for the unexpired portion of the member whose place is left vacant.

ARTICLE II
MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES

SECTION 1. Regular Meetings

Regular meetings of the Board [of Trustees] shall be held [once] twice a year [,without notice] at the principal office of the corporation in Puting Kahoy, Silang, Cavite, Philippines [Islands] , or at such other place or places as the Board by resolution may from time to time determine [, on the third Tuesday of each month at 2:00 p.m.]

SECTION 2. Special Meetings
Special meetings of the Board may be held at any time, by order of the Chair[man] or Vice-Chair[man], and shall be held upon the written request to the Chair[man] or the Vice-Chair[man] of any two members of the Board at the time in office.

SECTION 3. Notice of [Special] Meetings
The secretary shall [cause to be mailed or telegraphed] send notice of regular and special meetings by mail or any means of electronic communication to each member of the Board, at [his] their last known address, or at such address as each such member may have given to [him] them for that purpose, a notice stating the time and place and agenda of such [special] meeting. Such notice shall be sent no less than sixty days before the date of the meeting. [; nevertheless any member may waive notice of any meeting of the Board, and, at any meeting at which every member in office shall be present, though held without notice; any business may be transacted.]
The business transacted at any [special] meeting of the Board [of Trustees] shall be confined to that stated in the notice thereof, except by unanimous consent of all the members of the Board present in the meeting.

SECTION 4. Quorum
A majority of the members of the Board [of Trustees] shall constitute a quorum at any regular or special meeting for the transaction of any business, except to adjourn, and no notice of any adjourned meeting shall be required.
Except as otherwise provided by the laws of the Philippines [Islands], the affirmative vote of a majority of the trustees, present at any meeting, at which there shall be a quorum, shall be necessary to, and sufficient for, the adoption of any resolution.

ARTICLE III
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

SECTION 1.
Composition There shall be an Executive Committee to consist of [eleven] fifteen members of the Board [of Trustees] as said Board [may] shall designate, who shall exercise such powers between the meetings of the Board [of Trustees] as said Board may from time to time lawfully delegate to it.

SECTION 2. Quorum
At any meeting of the Executive Committee, [five] eleven members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of any business.
Except as otherwise provided by the laws of the Philippines, the affirmative vote of a majority of the members, present at any meeting, at which there shall be a quorum, shall be necessary to, and sufficient for, the adoption of any resolution.
ARTICLE IV
OFFICERS

SECTION 1. Election of Officers
SECTION 1.1 Board
The President of the North Philippine Union Mission [or Conference] shall be the Chair of the Board.
At their organization meeting, the members of the Board [of Trustees] shall elect from among themselves [a Chairman,] a Vice-Chair[man], [, a President,] a Secretary, a Business Manager, and a Treasurer. [The same persons may hold and perform the duties of more than once [sic] office, provided they are not incompatible with each other.]

SECTION 1.2 University
The Board shall elect the President and Vice-Presidents [or their equivalent] for academic affairs, financial affairs, and student affairs of the University from a list of candidates recommended by a Search Committee whose functions shall be to search, interview, and evaluate qualified candidates for the said offices. Candidates do not have to be members of the Board.
The Search Committee shall be composed of seven members and shall be appointed by the Board and have at least one calendar year to perform its function. Among its members, representatives from the University’s alumni associations in the Philippines, Western, and Eastern North America shall be included. It shall cease to function after their recommendations have been submitted to and voted by the Board.

SECTION 1.3 Term of Office
The term of office for officers of the Board and the University shall be five years.

SECTION 1.4 Term Limit
There shall be no term limit for officers of the Board and the University.


SECTION 1.4 Resignation or Removal of University Officers
Resignation or removal of University officers shall be for the same reasons as those of members of the Board as provided in these By-laws, Article I, Section 1.2, and subsections 1.2.a to 1.2.e inclusive.


SECTION 2. The Chair[man]
The Chair[man] shall preside at all meetings of the Board [of Trustees], and of the members of the [c]Corporation.

SECTION 3. The Vice-Chair[man]
The Vice-Chair[man], in the absence of the Chair[man], shall preside at all meetings of the Board [of Trustees] and of the members of the [c] C orporation.

SECTION 4. The President
The President shall, with the Chair[man] and Secretary, sign all appointments, contracts, and other documents, the [executive] execution of which has been authorized by the Board; and shall perform such additional duties as may from time to time be authorized or required by the Board [of Trustees].

SECTION 5. The Secretary
The Secretary shall, with the Chair[man] and the President, sign all appointments, contracts, and other documents, the execution of which has been authorized by the Board; [he shall] keep the records of the [c]Corporation and shall be the custodian of its corporate seal [.] , and [shall] keep an accurate record of the minutes of the Board [of Trustees], and of the members of the [c] Corporation, and shall perform such other duties as the Board may prescribe.

SECTION 6. The Business Manager
The Business Manager shall have direct charge and supervision of all the business and financial activities of the [c]Corporation.

SECTION 7. The Treasurer
The Treasurer shall have charge of the funds of the [c]Corporation and shall disburse them pursuant to the instructions of the Board [of Trustees .] , and shall keep proper books of account of the finance of the [c]Corporation.

ARTICLE V
MEETINGS OF MEMBERS

SECTION 1.
The meetings of members shall be held, not less than once every two years, at the place where the principal office of the corporation is established, or at such other place or places as the Board may determine, at such time as the Board [of Trustees] may designate, notice of which shall be given in writing by the Secretary[.] to the members no less than 60 days before the meeting.

ARTICLE VI
MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS

SECTION 1. Amendments

These [b]By-laws may be amended, repealed or altered in whole or in part, by the affirmative vote of the majority of the members of the [c]Corporation at any regular or special meeting duly called for such purpose.

SECTION 2. Rules and Regulations
The Board [of Trustees] may from time to time adopt and pass rules and regulations, provided that they are not in conflict with the present [b]By-laws.

SECTION 3. Fiscal Year
The fiscal year of the [c]Corporation shall begin on the first day of April in each year and end on the last day of March of the following year.

SECTION 4. Seal
The seal of the [c]Corporation shall be in the form of a circle and shall bear the name of the [c]Corporation and the year of its incorporation.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, etc, etc, etc

* * *



RATIONALE FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO BY-LAWS OF ADVENTIST UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES [AUP]

ARTICLE I
SECTION 1. 1. Composition

“from hereon called the Board”: to eliminate redundancy

“their”: common usage now to use plural to refer to singular neutral noun in place of he/she; current “his” is no longer correct considering female member/s

“five”: to correspond to denominational 5-year terms

“twenty-one”: expand membership to include presidents of alumni associations in the Philippines, Western and Eastern North America; alumni are financial supporters of the University and should have a voice in the Board; will also add variety and perspective from an extrinsic point of view

General Conference Working Policy, 2001-2002 edition: Article IV allows 15 to 21 members in the Board of [Trustees]

“non-denominationally employed persons: will add variety and perspective with no fear of being beholden to the powers that be in the denomination

Mandate/specify inclusion of administrative officers of the Union and the University since the University is under jurisdiction of the Union

Student government president inclusion: provide training ground for leadership; Board transparency to eyes of student leader who represents the students, the reason for existence of the University

Faculty representative inclusion: will add variety and perspective from non-administrator

SECTION 1.2. Resignation or Removal of Trustees
“the same”: not all members are necessarily male gender

Reasons for removal are self-explanatory

SECTION 2. Powers

Delete “of Trustees”: uniformity throughout the whole By-laws as introduced in SECTION 1.1.

“for cause”: it is illegal, unethical, and immoral to remove anyone from a position or office with no just cause nor due process
“Corporation”: cosmetic change to refer to it as a proper noun in the whole By-laws

ARTICLE II
SECTION 1. Regular Meetings

“twice”: one meeting a year may not be enough to discuss various items in yearly affairs of the University

Delete “without notice”: members need to be notified of meeting dates

Delete “Islands”: Philippines should be sufficient

Delete “on the third Tuesday of each month at 2:00 p.m.” is needed; after all, Board meetings are not held every month at that hour

SECTION 2.

Change to Chair and Vice-Chair in the whole By-laws instead of Chairman and Vice-Chairman more politically correct considering that women may someday be chairs or vice-chairs

SECTION 3.

Delete “special”: this provision is for both regular and special meetings

“send notice of regular and special meetings by mail or any means of electronic communication”: technologically up to date rather than telegraph

“their” and “them” instead of his and him: common usage now allows using plural form to include both genders

“Such notice shall be sent no less than sixty days before the date of the meeting”: self-explanatory

Delete provision allowing waiver of notice: self-explanatory

Delete “special” and “of Trustees”: already explained previously

“present in the meeting”: clarification; self-explanatory

ARTICLE III
SECTION 1. Composition

Increase Executive Committee members from eleven to fifteen: explanation to follow

Replace “may” with “shall”: makes this provision a mandate

SECTION 2. Quorum

Change quorum for Executive Committee from “five” to “eleven” members: this way, majority vote will require at least six votes, same as the least number of majority votes in a regular or special meeting of the Board. If the number of Board members is 21, quorum will be 11; majority vote of 11 in attendance is 6. The By-laws now provides a quorum of 5 from a membership of 11. Potentially, only 3 members which is a majority if only 5 are in attendance can decide on anything. This number is unacceptable inasmuch as a full board meeting requires at least 6 votes to adopt any resolution.

“Except as otherwise provided by the laws of the Philippines, the affirmative vote of a majority of the members, present at any meeting, at which there shall be a quorum, shall be necessary to, and sufficient for, the adoption of any resolution”: self-explanatory

ARTICLE IV
SECTION 1.1 Board

“The president of the North Philippine Union Mission [or Conference] shall be the Chair of the Board.” :self-explanatory; inclusion of [or Conference] in case NPUM becomes a Union Conference

Deletion “of Trustees” already explained

Deletion of “a Chairman”: needed since NPUM president is mandated to be chair in foregoing amendment.

Deletion of “The same person may hold and perform…”: self-explanatory

SECTION 1.2 University

“The Board shall elect the President and Vice-Presidents [or Deans] of the University from a list of candidates recommended by a Search Committee whose function shall be to search, interview, and evaluate qualified candidates for the said offices. Candidates do not have to be members of the Board.”: self-explanatory

“The Search Committee shall be composed of seven members and shall be appointed by the Board and have at least one calendar year to perform its function. Among its members, representatives from the University’s alumni associations in the Philippines, Western, and Eastern North America shall be included. It shall cease to function after their recommendations have been submitted to and voted by the Board.”: self-explanatory

SECTION 1.3 Term of Office

The term of office for officers of the Board and the University shall be five years.” : self-explanatory

SECTION 1.4 Resignation or Removal of University Officers
“Resignation or removal of University officers shall be for the same reasons as those of members of the Board as provided in these By-laws, Article I, Section 1.2, and subsections 1.2.a to 1.2.e inclusive.”: self-explanatory

SECTION 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Deleting “man” and “of Trustees” and upper case “C” for Corporation: already explained

Changing from “executive” to execution” is just a correction of a typographical error. [4]

Replacing the period [.] with a comma [,] is just a correction of a typographical error. [4]

Deleting “he shall”: superfluous; initial phrase in sentence already has the word “shall”; the rest are enumerated items from same “shall” [5]


ARTICLE V
SECTION 1.

“or at such other place or places as the Board may determine”: self-explanatory

Deleting “of Trustees”: already explained

Deleting period [.] to make room for completion of sentence, “to the members no less than 60 days before the meeting.”: self-explanatory

ARTICLE VI
SECTION 1, 2, 3, 4
Upper case “B” for By-laws: cosmetic change [1]

Deleting “of Trustees”: already explained [2]

Upper case “C” for Corporation: already explained [1, 3, 4]

2 comments:

Unknown said...

This is Advin greeting you.

I am part of a group of concerned Adventists who in one way or another desires to see purity in its members who have found themselves in the service or ministry of our country and the church. I am talking about those who have been given opportunity to serve God (supposedly) in positions of great sensitivity and sacredness as to be given a serious attention if not something to reconsider whether to support or reprimand. We are not ourselves pure or blemish-free but by God’s grace and the fear of dragging the church into a sinkhole, then we will ourselves try our best to come out unscathed by the influence of the world. Please pray with and for us aswell.

Surely, it’s not by anyone of us in the “lay-members” category who will do this but our religious leaders. This is quite a task that I know my group or myself can’t accomplish by ourselves. We as a church must do it by not blinking an eye or turning our heads away when we see wrong or evil things being done. We participate in the wrongs of others if we don’t do anything (omission) as much as when we do it ourselves (commission).

By doing so, we will realize that we are sharing the same worries and apprehensions but are taking steps to curb or stop the possible exponential growth of the dangers that are being brought by those that “use” our church for their own “personal selfish” interests.

There is a two-fold goal or aim of this Expose or revelation and that is, first, to hold in check the activities of our “Adventist government and institutional leaders” who misuse the name of the church in pursuit of their own well-being (if not intentional, then to awaken them of their supposed “calling in their workplace” like Daniel, Joseph, Esther etc.) and fails to forward the mission of the church where they are; and second, to allow our church leaders to exercise their spiritual and moral ascendancy or ecclesiastical powers or church authority even over their constituents or colleagues who are wielding institutional and governmental or political powers (local or national in scope) who play some “dirty’ OR unwarranted church politics instead of real Godly service and representation.

Our values include truth, transparency, openness, justice, equality, service, excellence, mission, and integrity. With this we hope to be able to help our church in one way or another.

It is not our claim to know for a fact that everything said here is precise so we ask you to stay on-line and with us to provide factual data or to refute the allegations and correct misconceptions or provide clarifications on issues that are raised.

Let this “future” blog (which is now limited to email messages) open our understanding of our mission and not be swayed by money or power that holding government office brings.

For now, we start with exchanges of information and hoping that those who are “under investigation” will share to us in part or in whole their views and explanation to cleanse their names or clarify what are misconstrued or misread or the misinformation brought by communication gaps, exaggerated information or the lack thereof.

Lets keep this as a site solely for professional, proactive and constructive comments, suggestions and discussions that will meet our intended goals. Christ is coming and we need to be prepared to meet Him with pure hearts such as the Israelites did when meeting God in mount Sinai.

We do all this in prayer. Let God be our witness and guide. Let us represent our church rightly and with respect. No “one voice” for the church here in the Philippines except God’s. No one representative except the Holy Spirit. And no one decision except that of our church leaders en banc.


How do you participate: may we inform you that we get your emails from all sources such as friends and personal contacts. If you have additional information or facts or want to have more from other “bloggers” to make clear the allegations or whether you just want to be clarified deeper, you can just simply email us at Adventist.investigates@gmail.com.

We do hope that you have the exact and correct facts and data to back you information if you have some. Second hand information must be validated and verified before stating it as a fact if not then it will be categorized as hearsay.

Help us make this better: You may also suggest how we can best make this site be more useful for the church in general and to the persons involved in particular.

God grant us the audacity to change the things we ought to change and humility to accept those that we cannot and step down if need be.

Our short list for the moment includes the following persons and groups:

Ambassador Bienvenido Tejano
Former Congressman Harlin Abayon
Former Usec. Teddie Rivera
Bro. Rodolfo “Jun” Bautista
BULB or SDAPS
Dr. Bibly Macaya
You may add your own complaints below.

Disclaimer: As moderator, we will not print words that are unchristian or that is profane in nature (we reserve the right to have our own category) but will delete those words or ask you to put appropriate words or expressions that would reveal your true concern rather than appearing vengeful before we print your comments or blog. We also would be deleting your “shared experience” if its personal in nature and not related to the issues affecting the church in general.

We also cannot divulge our identity as yet since it may create an uneven plain where we all wsih to lay all these things. So bear with us and for sure, the people concerned and the leaders will all come across this site and read your emails.

You may use a pseudonym or you can use your own email. Whatever your decision, your participation will be well received and noted.

In Christ alone,

ADVIN


Note: it is our belief and expectedly, this will not be a welcome development to those who are involved in unwanted acts but would be a great blessing for the whole church if taken as a positive measure; that is our primary objective.


Lets begin with:
Ambassador Bienvenido Tejano. A former Health Ministries Director of the North Philippine Union Mission

1. As his claim is, was he really the person responsible for the law that allowed for 2 board exams where one must be Sabbath-free? Or was it the former Congressman Harlin Abayon? Why was he not invited by Teddy Rivera, Abayon and Jun Bautista during the BULB National Summit? Is it because he does not reflect the ideals of the group?
2. What is true that ADRA was only used by the Total Health Clinic in Paranaque and that the land in which the clinic is built on in the name of Tejano?
3. Is it true that 3ABN in the Philippines is registered to the personal ownership name of Tejano? What’s the status to date of the least used television ministry in the Philippines?
4. The “Yacht” that was supposedly donated to the ministry work in the Philippines also is registered in his name?
5. What really happened to the millions of dollars to establish 3ABN Philippines and 3ABN Papua New Guinea?
6. What happened to the many promises that Amba Tejano made to the church? How many have been fulfilled? How many were just written on sand?
7. Is it true that the helicopter used during the travel of President Paulsen in the country during last year’s 2008 Annual GC Meetings charged or billed to the SSD?
8. Is it true that one PCGG officer is currently investigating Amba Tejano’s wealth? Have you seen his mansions (condos and lands) in Pasay, Paranaque, Palawan, Samar and many other places? How can an Ambassador amass all those properties? Is it true that Amba is now worth 500Million?
9. Has he been a “light”to the Arroyos’s during his friendship with them or has he sold the church to them as a goldmine for himself? (Was he the one tagging along with the First Gentleman during the trips the FG made during the election campaign distributing money around the country?)
10. Why was Pastor Max Cadalig (an elected PARL and Communication Director of NPUM in the constituency meeting of 2005) replaced by forced by Tejano? Is it so he can still continue to benefit (as he is heard to admit) from the retirement benefits of retired pastors of the Adventist Church? He was even getting health subsidy from the Manila Adventist Medical Center (Dr. Bibly, what’s your reaction?)
11. Why was he not stripped off the “pastoral” title when he is no longer functioning as one? (Let’s ask Pastor Roque)
12. Has he not used some signing groups to entertain public officials in his mansion in Multinational and promised them a uniform for their ministry but did not fulfill it?
13. Is it true that he blackmailed the Abayon’s in order to get the Party List Aangat Tayo (AT) for his own political ends again using the church?
14. It is widely reported that he promises a million votes to national political candidates using the church and telling the candidates that he is the spokesperson of the Adventist Church and that he holds the cloak of authority around the country? (How true is this Elder Albert Gulfan?)
15. He also claims to be the leader of “all” Adventist pastors and leaders in the country. How true is this Tri-union presidents? (Pastors Roque, Catane, Serrano sirs?)
16. Mr. Jun Bautista was overheard talking about his assistance to Amba Tejano once when he was eyeing New Zealand for ambassadorship and Jun helped him allegedly to speak with President Arroyo in one of the oath-takings of Bantay Turismo(?) in Malacanang; helped also in the press conference with Papua New Guinea Ministers who lost their media contacts, etc. but was laid aside instead of showing gratitude. (Mr. Bautista, how true is this ungratefulness?)
17. How about the double dealing of Tejano when he snatched Sen Loren Legarda to speak in MVC last 2007 Youth meetings when it was John Koch, the friend of Loren, who brought and invited her to the meetings to speak to our Adventist members. Tejano then showed unequivocal support to the staunch critique of his boss, the President Gloria. He even made it appear that he was the one who caused the attendance of Loren, Lacson, etc. Is this a blatant political playing in the midst of Adventist members? How Brazen! We received photographs of this from concerned Adventist leaders and members. (Is this precise John Koch?)
18. What assistance, support has he really given to the church and its mission in the Philippines? (Can anyone help us detail them so we can account?)
19. Who gained financially from the deals of Eternal Gardens Memorial Park? Who were with him in those deals that benefited as well? (Did we hear that Amba even threatened the owner of Eternal Gardens that he will throw him off the helicopter if he twists more stories?) Please speak up if you know.
20. What kind of light has he shown as an Adventist when he goes to different political parties and expresses support using the same people (the Adventists) as his leverage?
21. From our Papua New Guinea OFWs, what’s your comment?
22. Senator Lacson has enjoyed the company of Tejano In New Zealand. Any development of political affiliation mr. Amba?
23. What about the sad news of going head-to-head against a good friend Congressman Abayon in the congressional district in Northern Samar and joining the Dazas? A betrayal or a political maneuvering?

• Are all these external shows and promises meant only to “fool and deceive” the church that Amba Tejano is really helping the church or is he just using the name of the church for his own ends?
• Why can’t our leadership muzzle this man who has been making “deals” in the name of the church and earning lots for that matter?

KNOW MORE? KEEP US POSTED! If you can substantiate and provide details please help us so we can both clean his name and exonerate him or end his mischief and self-serving activities.

It is our responsibility and accountability to stop this “messing” around. If we can see some members who could be trusted to really do the task of the PR of the church in government circles, let us look for one other than a man with a character like Amba Tejano.


Next in Line…wiat for the updates as we will hear from all sides…

Anonymous said...

Who knows where to download XRumer 5.0 Palladium?
Help, please. All recommend this program to effectively advertise on the Internet, this is the best program!